The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
The charts illustrate the production of electricity from different sources in two countries namely New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
Overall, in both nations, the number of units of electricity generated in 2010 was higher than in 1980. In 2010, most electricity in New Zealand came from coal whereas in Germany, it mainly came from nuclear.
In New Zealand, the production of electricity from coal increased significantly, from 56 units in 1980 to 150 units in 2010. In contrast, there was a decline in the number of electrical units generated from natural gas and petroleum which decreased to 28 and 9 units respectively. Electricity generation by hydro changed unotiably, from 30 to 46 units in 2010.
In Germany, nuclear became the main source of electricity, accounted for 155 units in 2010. However, the units of electricity produced by hydro and natural gas declined to 2 units each after 30 years. Whereas, the generation of electricity from coal and petroleum remained stable, at 28 and 27 units respectively.
- The graph below shows the changes in UK birth rate in 6 different age groups from 1973 to 2008 73
- The chart below give information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002 67
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009 72
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent, do you argee or disargee? 56
- The two column charts show the percentage of food and other items bought by 3 European countries in 1998 and 2008 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... 56 units in 1980 to 150 units in 2010. In contrast, there was a decline in the nu...
^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecline in the number of electrical units generated from natural gas and petroleum...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10059171598 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99929382583 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502958579882 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.4746771081 43.030603864 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.7777777778 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307177718428 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161207566103 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109182216776 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24913329872 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11509955775 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.