The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
The presented pie charts compare the average household budget in different coutries, namely Japan and Malaysia in 2010 by percentage.
It can be seen clearly that the proportion of transport, housing and other goods and services are major.
As we can see, the most money used to pay out other goods and services in Japan, at 29%; whereas that of in Malaysia is 26%. The highest percentage in Malaysia belong to housing, at 34%, more than 13% in Japan. In comparison with Malaysia, the amount of money used for food in Japan is 24%, less than 3%.
In addition, the average household fund for transport in Japan is 20%, twice as high as that of in Malaysia. This difference is repeated in health care. While this figure is 6% in Japan, the expenditure which Malaysians paid out for it make up just 3%. Both of whom are the lowest percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | Chayacp | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | thanhthanh211 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | Zulph_ | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...ing, at 34%, more than 13% in Japan. In comparison with Malaysia, the amount of money used...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 692.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61333333333 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4751565607 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613333333333 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 207.9 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1626557134 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.8888888889 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299853897495 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110172176647 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121758830144 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176817718549 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14292385983 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.