The diagrams below show the results of a survey from Taiwan explaining how students, wanting to study overseas, chose a university from 1998-2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparision where relevant.
The tables present the statistical data on the change in the percentage of reasons for choosing an abroad university over 11-year period from 1998 to 2008 by sexes in Taiwan.
Paying attention to diagrams, it can be clearly seen that the university's ranking was usually the highest consideration with both two genders over the period of time.
A series of data revealed that all male learners who took part in the research said that the grade was their most reflection. However, this reason decreased significantly by 100% to 90% in 2008 (the third considerable reason). Although teaching techniques and tutors' ability shared the same ratio in 1998 with a fifth each, by the year 2008, the teachers' quality was more considered (7%) than the teaching methods (only 2%). In addition, the teaching techniques were also the least considerable element with the boy students, just 8% in 1998. Additionally, the university facilities possessed the highest change in the survey of the counterparts, a decline of nearly a quarter, from 66% to just 42%.
In conclusion, due to the change in awareness and favourite, the reasons for why attending an oversea university has altered significantly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-20 | Thang Tran | 89 | view |
- Some people think that good health is very important to every person, so medical service should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages. 61
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your opinions 79
- The diagram below shows the changes in the number of people who rely on fuel from organic sources form 2004 to 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 83
- The diagram below shows information about the usage of boys names from 1920s to 2000s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The diagrams below show the results of a survey from Taiwan explaining how students wanting to study overseas chose a university from 1998 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 153, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...deration with both two genders over the period of time. A series of data revealed that all m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, third, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12435233161 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92596137474 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637305699482 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8496231132 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.625 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121937415331 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511967931306 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440989420687 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694073881886 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489016931308 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.