Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups, while others believe that it is better for them to study alone.
Discuss both views and give your opinions.
Studying in groups brings a great number of benefits for learners; however, some individuals think that students should learn alone. Both these views will be outlined in this essay and I believe that learning together is more beneficial.
Students could receive some superiors from studying alone. Initially, they have more opportunities to practice several initiatives and develop it on their own. In comparison with learning with their friends, they might be affected by other opinions and they could not materialize the ideas completely following their mind. Secondly, they would be more active in their learning. Learners could study whenever they desire and do not depend on others like learning in groups. To be specific, the learners do not have to rely on their friends’ time, the attendance of groups’ members, among other examples.
On the other hand, some people argued that pupil could achieve more advantages in learning in groups. Firstly, students could discuss their ideas with others and point out good and worse aspects from their opinions. As a result, they have opportunities to complete their projects as well as they could. For example, once an idea is discussed, more views would be outlined to contribute for it and its drawbacks could be improved. Furthermore, students could acquire more knowledge from their classmates by studying with them. People who study together could share their initiative and knowledge with others and more information would be obtained.
In conclusion, despite the benefits of learning alone, I believe that it is more effective when students study with their friends.
- The diagram below shows participation in leisure time activities by age and gender.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The diagram below shows information about the usage of boys names from 1920s to 2000s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- The diagrams below show the results of a survey from Taiwan explaining how students wanting to study overseas chose a university from 1998 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 72
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some of or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages ? 84
- The diagram below shows the changes in the number of people who rely on fuel from organic sources form 2004 to 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparision where relevant 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...iatives and develop it on their own. In comparison with learning with their friends, they ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36964980545 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69135280387 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525291828794 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0732375523 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28944959303 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116797448955 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771180127095 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212858838288 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572136505027 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.