. Should a city try to preserve its old, historic buildings or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
There has appeared endless discussion over the fate of historic monuments. Some people are in favor of preserving old buildings while others hold strong belief in the advantages of demolishing them and replacing with modern ones. From my own viewpoint, I show great interest in the former.
First and foremost, it is necessary to preserve old buildings because of their cultural value, which is of particular importance for the modern society. It cannot be denied that historic heritages clearly reflect dedicated effort and commitment of our ancestors. They represent not only the aesthetic soul but also the incredible strength and precious virtues of our forebears. For instance, Co Loa Citadel in Vietnam, which was built to defense the country against Chinese enemy, was a remarkable fortress with spiral, multi-layered structure and excessive amount of human strength. Certainly, these monuments serve as a symbol to memorialize our ancestors' achievements especially when many young people nowadays are trying to ignore cultural and traditional values. More importantly, culture exchange is an essential facet. It is manifest that people are always eager to learn more, to know more about the culture of other countries. Fortunately, preserving historic buildings is an easy way to spread country image and the great stature of our predecessors to the world. Therefore, it is apparently inappropriate to destroy old monuments that contain enormous cultural values.
Secondly, economic stimulation draws much of my attention. It is obvious that historic monuments will attract tourists from all over the world. Streams of tourists are certain to contribute a large amount of money to the city budget. In addition, they are likely to tell others about their memorable experience of visiting famous historic constructions. Thus, national tourism will definitely be improved . More notably, tourism development will result in stimulating other sectors due to the boosted budget. Terrible transportation, atrocious infrastructure will be better repaired and properly upgraded. In this way, living standards will also be promoted.
All in all, not only culture value but also economic stimulation greatly convince me for my opinion. I strongly believe that city leaders should consider my analysis to adopt proper policies on the fate of historic bulidings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | ashish150395 | 60 | view |
| 2019-07-26 | sena | 71 | view |
| 2019-05-27 | Hà Phúc Khang | 76 | view |
| 2019-05-15 | osfallatah89 | 70 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | ayush.rga | 70 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table below shows the number of cars produced in 3 countries between 2003 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
- In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the modern society. It cannot be denied that historic heritages clearly reflect ...
^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...i-layered structure and excessive amount of human strength. Certainly, these monu...
^^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...onal tourism will definitely be improved . More notably, tourism development will ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2010.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58333333333 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95208732271 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613888888889 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.78579906 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3636363636 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3636363636 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77272727273 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176263368074 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0414794101509 0.076458572812 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630737215819 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108576243269 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686281709778 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 58.1214874552 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.