Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.
The question is whether nowadays young people play a crucial role in decisions of society or not. Everyone with regard to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this statement; however, I am inclined to affirm that prosperity of the modern world depends on the young's knowledge, energy and impetuses and without them and their opinions accessing to the future will not be possible. I feel this way for some reasons, which I will explore them in following essay to empower my vantage point:
To begin with, nobody could overlook that youths' soul has a high level of curiosity and they look for finding new approaches and thoughts to solve the troubles. The dream of reputation causes the young to make effort for gaining the best status in the future; hence, they are highly motivated. Since the condition of education has improved compared with the past; therefore it paves the road for the young to achieve their goals as soon as possible. Besides, some students leave the country for learning the most up-dated strategies for boosting quality in the community and after graduation and collecting enough and worthwhile experience, they will return and all of their experiences will launch in the different section of industry, medical, business and list goes on.
The second reason for my argument lies the reality that youths are capable of learning quickly; consequently, the young generation never refute technology. In such technology- driven world, societies are competing with each other in acquiring scientific achievements, so the young can adapt to a variety of technology and extract the needed information's communities. In a comparison with old people who just tend to have a fix income and also do not have enough tendencies for working with technology and electronic devices, the young attempt to do their best. Communication with other students, scholars, researchers and a wide range of occupations in all over the world through internet provides a strong knowledge base for young people to make logical decisions.
To sum up, this conclusion could be drawn that I strongly agree that youths have positive impacts on the development of countries. Youths' desires and motivations lead them to study hard and broaden their abilities. Meanwhile a surge of knowledge steepens into society through technology.
- Do you agree or disagree? when teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 72
- A university has money in its budget to do one thing to improve its facilities for students It can either improve the quality of the technology for example computers and printers that it provides for students Or it can redesign spaces where students hold 93
- Tpo12 83
- tpo25 86
- some people say that the internet provides people with a lot of valuable information; others think access to so much information creates problem. which view do you agree with? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...study hard and broaden their abilities. Meanwhile a surge of knowledge steepens into soci...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, hence, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, while, i feel, to begin with, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 379.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21635883905 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76607771813 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606860158311 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.6839231566 48.9658058833 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.076923077 100.406767564 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1538461538 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 5.45110844103 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190449956226 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666521074071 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556814552313 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107179626529 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558475250535 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 11.7677419355 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.