The best way for government to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that traffic congestion is becoming a controversial issue in many major cities. Although I agree that government can provide free public transport to address this problem, I do not consider that it is the best solution.
On the one hand, there are many great advantages from serving transport system. By adopting this policy, governments, as well as many nations around the world saw a significant decline in the number of cars which used on the street. As a result, it is the beneficial way for society to reduce the risk of the accident which occurs frequently on the roads and cut down a large amount of emission gas which released into the atmosphere. Furthermore, using public transport allow commuters to save much money paying for gas, parking fees and taxes. For instance, if you use the private vehicle, you will have to pay taxes for fuels and maintenance service. By the restriction of wasting money, you can spend the amount of money on various personal purposes.
On the other hand, the government should take into consideration about some disadvantages before applying a free public transport system. Firstly, traffic congestion only happens during rush hours due to a large number of commuters, so it would be a waste of money to supply free transport at night. In addition, there are important fields in the society which need investment such as building or upgrading transport infrastructure. For example, they should spend a large money to repair and broaden the road so drivers can easily go faster without worrying about any troubles. Secondly, people who commute by public transport may suffer the variety of dangers from criminals. As a consequence, the number of bus or train which increase rapidly at the same time can result in raising the crime rate. By illegal activities of offenders, residents can be threated to their property or their life.
In conclusion, it seems to me that governments should serve appropriately free public transport as well as combine with other effective measures to tackle traffic congestion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-24 | Manpreet aujla | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-15 | PhuongLee | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | hongthuy | 56 | view |
| 2018-05-26 | Rapunzel | 79 | view |
| 2018-04-29 | ta khanh tam | 56 | view |
- Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve Others believe individuals can also do some things to solve these problems Discuss both views and give your own opinion 68
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Modern technology now allows rapid and uncontrolled access to and exchange of information Far from being beneficial this is a danger to our societies To what extent do you agree or disagree 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...n only happens during rush hours due to a large number of commuters, so it would be a waste of mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'large money'.
Suggestion: large money
...ructure. For example, they should spend a large money to repair and broaden the road so drive...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06451612903 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81372148183 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589442815249 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6592253429 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.9375 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223209207216 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695225095332 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712807962236 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155993199634 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710651103269 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.