In your opinion, what are the qualities of a good friend? Use specific details and examples in your answer.
Friends are people who we coomunicate closely with and share our lives with. Personally, I think that friends have to be responsible and positive. There are a few reasons why I hold this stance.
First of all, I have to count on my friend when I need her help. There are different situations people face in life in which they need help of others, and if there is a person who is able to support them when they need it, they can consider the indidvidual a friend. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Back in Russia, I have a woman who is a close friend of mine. I know that if I ask her to do something important to me, she always will do it. In this way, when I moved to the United States and asked her to take care of a cat I left behind, she promised to look after the animal, and she did that. She took him to her house and provided him with shalter, food and love right to the moment I was able to transport the cat to the U.S. To that end, a reliable friend always keeps her or his word and therefore, helps us to overcome difficulties in life.
Secondly, positive nature of a friend helps us to keep up with life and never give up. When a friend we spend a lot of time with is negative and sees life in dark collors, it can be imposible to enjoy friendship. Conversaly, when a firend encougares us when we feel frustrated, it makes life colorful and less stressful. For instanse, my friend Tania, who I mentioned above, is an incedibly optimistic and funny person. She makes a lot of jockes all the time, so it is always pleasantly to be around her. In this way, when I feel depressed, she supports me with her hilarious stories and jockes which helps me to relax, forget about my problems and enjoy our communication. That is why having a positive friend is pivotal for me.
To conclude, I strongly believe, that a great friend is the one who is reliable and cheerful. This is because it helps me to overcome difficulties and stay in well emotional shape.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-13 | meet96301 | 90 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | Hibahtabbaa | 61 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | Hibahtabbaa | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | joyce05 | 63 | view |
| 2022-12-19 | nph | 76 | view |
- Many people have a close relationships with their pets. These people trat their birds, cats, or other animals like members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 70
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 44
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made the world a better place to live. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Modern technology is creating a single world culture. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 442, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'will' and 'do'.
Suggestion: will always do
...er to do something important to me, she always will do it. In this way, when I moved to the Un...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lties and stay in well emotional shape.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i feel, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.288 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53789063769 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509333333333 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3819146234 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6315789474 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7368421053 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47368421053 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.064735578352 0.236089414692 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0265718959092 0.076458572812 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0220797701319 0.0737576698707 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0447374643437 0.150856017488 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00838229279948 0.0645574589148 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 11.7677419355 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.6 10.9000537634 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.