work with mistakes 2 In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this.
For generations in many countries young adults have been encouraged to take a gap year after high school. Below merits and drawbacks of the prospect will be discussed in details.
On the one hand, there are several gains of the practice. Firstly, studying at high school and preparation for the final exams is a challenging and arduous task. In fact, many listeners are so exhausted that they may experience severe cases of anxiety, hysteria, and even a nervous breakdown. To address those psychological illnesses and syndromes doctors often prescribe having a journey to a foreign country. Secondly, some need get financial resources to pay for studying at university. Not going directly to a tertiary institution allows a person to earn and save up enough money to start education without taking a student loan. Accordingly, those are several benefits of having a year gap.
On the other hand, some downsides ought to be mention as well. Primarily, those who took a gap year less likely will enroll in university. Statistics shows that the majority of those who began working after school have never pursued a degree and a potential reason for this is encountering the experience of liberation from parents and their rules. On the top of that, having the one-year leave may unfavorably influence on students’ academic records. In fact, young adults who avoid taking a gap year are more likely to graduate from university than those who took it. It is plausible to speculate that to study successfully a person should recall a lot of information from a school program and the data is well-remembered by those who went from school to university directly than by those who had the vacation. Those are a few negative facets of the custom.
In conclusion, the tradition of having a gap year between school and university has some shortages and virtues and each person has a right to decide what is better for him or her.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-04-07 | Firl 89 | 56 | view |
2022-12-10 | thanhtu000 | 73 | view |
2022-02-04 | shadow1222 | 61 | view |
2021-09-10 | sheru | 61 | view |
2021-08-09 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 89 | view |
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little im 50
- Essay topics: TPO-46 - Integrated Writing Task 87
- Essay topics TPO 48 Integrated Writing Task 90
- TPO-22 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 93
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 84
Comments
Essay evaluation report
ought to be mention as well
ought to be mentioned as well
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 324 350
No. of Characters: 1561 1500
No. of Different Words: 183 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.243 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.818 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.73 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 113 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 81 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 59 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.059 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.219 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.471 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.311 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.486 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.044 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, firstly, may, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96913580247 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83290967542 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561728395062 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6299637365 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7058823529 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235617890246 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670814270759 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682276314747 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157741772645 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465506445649 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.