Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
In the modern world, people spend a myriad of time working and in order to benefit from it, we should think of what kind of schedule works better for us. Personally, I prefer to work long hours but just three days a week. There are a few reasons for that.
First of all, I have more time to spend with my family. If I have to work five days a week, I come back home tired and the only thing I want to do is to lay down and relax. On the other hand, when I have four days off every week, I have plenty of time and energy to devote it, people, I love. For instance, when I had an office job, I had to wake up early every morning and go to work almost every day. Very often, I felt drained and did not enjoy communicating with others. However, as soon as I took a job in a pharmacy and my schedule changed to just three days a week for twelve hours, I found myself liked it since the days left I was able to take my kids out regularly. In this way, we have visited a myriad of museums and children's entertaining shows. Moreover, now I have free time to meet my friends and relatives, so actively participate in their lives. To that end, now, I am closer to people I love.
Secondly, employees who work only a few days a week are more efficient. When workers have an opportunity to rest before a next workday are more enthusiastic in performing their duties and can benefit a company they work for. My own experience is a compelling example of this. Since I started working a long shift with a few days a week, every time I came back to work rester since during my days off I could sleep long enough to recover. As a result of this, I had a lot of energy to finish all wors tasks in the best way. Furthermore, I was able to introduce myriad ideas of how to improve a work routine. My manager noticed it right away and offered me a higher position. To that end, I was able to excel.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is better to work long hours three days a week than short hours but five days a week. This is because it gives employees more free time improve their relationships with family and friends, and helps them to build a career.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- A company has announced that it wishes to build a large factory nearyour community. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this newinfluence on your community. Do you support or oppose the factory?Explain your position. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ends, and helps them to build a career.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.12887828162 4.8611393121 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34441899651 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505966587112 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0984295367 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6363636364 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0454545455 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369453257795 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103459026434 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888860249548 0.0737576698707 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24276405853 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271647165997 0.0645574589148 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 11.7677419355 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 58.1214874552 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.67 10.9000537634 61% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.