Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.
Today in a world of much upraising and ever altering scenarios, providing a static curriculum is not beneficial and will not propel us forward by binding us to the much older prospects which may no longer even have relevance. Educators should make efforts to find out what students what to be included in their curriculum and then offer it to them.
A scenario where there is a more significant involvement of students in amending their curriculum will help in providing a dynamic course flow. This will help in incorporating what students expect from their course. Therefore significantly reviving the students with a new stream of interest and passion. Hence, this much needed enthusiasm will push students to achieve their goals and meet their expectations from the course which they aspire to achieve. Such a prominent student involvement must also be supervised by the educators. Educators and the concerned authorities must give the benefits of students the top most priority and also ensure that there is no conflict of opinions between different students. Educators must also provide their valuable advice to students according to their wit which they have acquired with their significant years of experience in their fields and guide students to choose the best addition to their curriculum by also providing industrial insights and latest trends which often educators have access to.
New additions tailored under the specific environments surrounding a particular time period when a course is being studied can help the students to build up better careers. For example if students of physics department are witnessing a greater boom in silicon industry then they most probably like to incorporate a course related to semiconductors in their curriculum. This ultimately will help them build better careers and will also provide much needed brains to the respective field of study.
A proper student-educator coordination can therefore provide the educational system with a much needed thrust. Such a collaboration on one of the most important and decisive factors for growth can lead to reaching new heights and zeniths in higher education and will revolutionize old parochial educational system.
Students today face the scenario where there is no one to provide a new outlook to their many years old curriculum which has not been changed along a long course of time frame leaving the curriculum devoid of many significant changes and revolutions the world has witnessed. Hence providing students the ability to choose additions to their curriculum will be very beneficial and fruitful for both students and society.
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance 50
- "Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued production of our alpaca overcoat. Now that we have a new fabric supplier, we should resume production. This coat should sell v 59
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them. 75
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance 66
- a nation should require all its students to study the same curriculum until they enter college 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...what students expect from their course. Therefore significantly reviving the students wit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 276, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...nd revolutions the world has witnessed. Hence providing students the ability to choos...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, look, may, so, then, therefore, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2225.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33573141487 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89558787595 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501199040767 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3529443404 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.0625 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0625 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273015326004 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111201666849 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158089579947 0.0758088955206 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171625424177 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111491669738 0.0667264976115 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.