The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the electricity units produced by energy sources in Australia and France in 1998 and 2000. Overall, the capability of electricity generation in both countries almost doubled with the increased from 100 units to 170 units in Australia and 90 units to 180 units in France.
To be more specific, in Australia, Coal continually played the leading role and it nearly trebled its production from 50 units to 130 units during the two decades. Similarly, Hydro Power also doubled its figure from 20 units to 36 units, whereas other resources like Natural Gas and Hydro Power dram...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-16 | kalampeet | 56 | view |
| 2020-07-25 | Charlotte Cullen | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-16 | jjj | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | Trương Bảo Kiên | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-21 | lssss | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purpose 70
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 45
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992.Summarise the informatioin by selecting and reportin the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 73
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future. Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 59
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 68
Comments
Essay evaluation report
with the increased
with the increase
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 200 200
No. of Characters: 994 1000
No. of Different Words: 111 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.761 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.97 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.67 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 69 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 52 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 28 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.384 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.513 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.694 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.188 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74319157187 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1756906439 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190055515413 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10186464746 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775138526922 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144554659934 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632694183319 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.