The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The mentioned line graph reflects average carbon dioxide (co2) released per person in four different countries namely the united kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal in between 1967 and 2007.
Overall, the highest amount of CO2 is emitted by the British people whereas the Portuguese people threw comparatively low amount of CO2 during the period of 40 years.
It is clear from the line graph that the British citizens were the most responsible to release CO2 in the year 1967 with a figure of nearly 10 metric tonnes which was then gradually declined upto the year 2007.Likewise, the Swedish contributed around 9 metric tonnes in the year 1967 which was then sharply increased upto 11 metric tonnes in the year 1977.Then, after a decade there was a downfall of 4 metric tonnes from 11 to 7 metric tonnes. And, finally there was a slight decline in the emission of co2 upto the year 2007.
Furthermore, it can be noticed that the Italian people threw CO2 approximately 5 metric tonnes in the year 1967. After that, there was a sharp increase upto the year 1997.However, there was a stability maintained between the year 1997 and 2007.Similarly, it can also be clearly noticed that the Portuguese people emitted relatively less amount of CO2 which was accounted for only 1 metric tonne in the year 1967.After wards, it slightly increased upto the year 2007 and had a figure of 5 metric tonnes.
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years. 56
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main f 56
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of the surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 73
- Nowadays it seems that almost all websites show online advertisements from other companies for products or services Is this a good thing or a bad thing 92
- The free movement of goods across national borders has long been a controversial issue Some people argue that it is necessary for economic growth while others claim that it damages local industries Discuss both views and give your own opinion You should w 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Likewise
...n gradually declined upto the year 2007.Likewise, the Swedish contributed around 9 metri...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
... upto 11 metric tonnes in the year 1977.Then, after a decade there was a downfall of...
^^^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be noticed that the Italian people threw CO2 approximately 5 metric tonnes in the...
^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...was a sharp increase upto the year 1997.However, there was a stability maintained betwe...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Similarly
...intained between the year 1997 and 2007.Similarly, it can also be clearly noticed that t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d 2007.Similarly, it can also be clearly noticed that the Portuguese people emitt...
^^
Line 7, column 415, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...or only 1 metric tonne in the year 1967.After wards, it slightly increased upto the y...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, likewise, similarly, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1165.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89495798319 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67099026013 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 137.141958082 43.030603864 319% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 194.166666667 112.824112599 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.6666666667 22.9334400587 173% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 5.23603664747 267% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152650610374 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11412511192 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12263008736 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139054019368 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142257797862 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.1 10.3012195122 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.