Providing financial aid to the poor can increase poverty. to what extent do you agree or disagree ? give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example
Exterminating poverty is one of the most important tasks of governments since not only does this means the misery of some people but it leads to crimes as well. While some believe this task is better done by distributing money, others think not only will not financial aid help them but it will eventually make the situation worse. I personally stand with the latter group due to several reasons which will be discussed in the following.
To begin with, from my point of view financial help to the poor is just a waste of resources which could be invested at more beneficial matters. Governments should contribute a large proportion of their budget to give money to the poor do they want to deal with poverty this way. In other words, poverty is the sponge that will not be filled but by pile loads of money. Doubtlessly, this money could be invested at elsewhere, such as industries, which not only does it escalate economy but it aids the poor by offering them a job and salary. For instance, in Iran politicians decided to distribute money from budget to solve poverty. To this day poverty has not been solved and also after this decision each government has a new problem in providing the budget.
Moreover, the matter of poverty will become worse if it is dealt with by financial aid. It can be stated that poor people will become lazier if they are given money because their financial needs are met by others. Thus, these lazy people will eventually become more poor since now they will not even try to solve their problems and poverty themselves.
Granted what was said, it can not be considered a bad method to help some people financially. What I mean is if a person is disabled, because of the consequences of the war or diseases, he should not be left alone to suffer in poverty in addition to miseries he already has. Their condition is the result of their physical status which definitely is not the consequence of monetary acts.
To sum up, I personally believe if one, person or government, wants to solve the poverty he should think of means other than simply financial help. That method will deteriorate the situation although his intentions are of utmost excellency. As the proverb says, do not give fish to the poor, teach them how to fish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-17 | pharmacist | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | pharmacist | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | hieu13092006 | 58 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | Hnam | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-19 | Mariamirabella | 78 | view |
- Write a letter to the shop you bought an equipment that you use for your jobin your letterdescribe the problems with the equipmentexplain how his problem is affecting your worksay what you want the shop or company to do 73
- some people consider price as the most important thing to consider when buying a product or a service . do you agree or disagree ? 84
- In recent years many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping Is this a positive or negative development 77
- Write a letter to your friend and arrange a meeting for visiting his new born baby 73
- many people prefer to spend money and not save it. what are the reasons ? is this a positive or negative development ? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mean'?
Suggestion: mean
...of governments since not only does this means the misery of some people but it leads ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, i mean, in addition, such as, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69423558897 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55185355834 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513784461153 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1765960495 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.055555556 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119964536612 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418379840817 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316782626681 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0671996746586 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208485379059 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.