The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The mentioned pie charts illustrate the difference in yearly expenditure of school in United Kingdom over the period of three decades 1981, 1991 and 2001 respectively.

Overall, as is represented by the pie charts, teachers' salaries was the most dominant spending, while insurance accounted relatively lower proportion of expenditure in annual basis in United Kingdom.

It is evident that during 1981 salaries of teachers had the highest ratio of 40%, which considerably increased by 10% after a decade then till 2001 it slightly decreased by 5% and reached 45% even though, fluctuation was notices it had maintained its the first rank in all three decades. In contrast, insurance had merely low percentage of expenditure only 2%, followed by 3% and 8 % in 1981, 1991 and 2001 respectively.

However, other workers' salaries had figure of 28% and resource contributed 15% of spending in 1981. But, after period of ten years the former moderately diminished by 6%, whereas the latter surged slightly by 5%. In addition, furniture and equipment altogether had ratio of 15%, which subsequently reduced by 10%,but it again boosted sharply and reached 23% in 2001.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-11 wardiati 11 view
2019-08-15 eurus0124 84 view
2019-08-15 eurus0124 61 view
2019-07-10 Mostafa Nabil 73 view
2019-07-10 Mostafa Nabil 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by user Sagarjango :
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...uctuation was notices it had maintained its the first rank in all three decades. In...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28494623656 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91026046009 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.084512284 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.428571429 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145234102595 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698213499527 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616151728733 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969918076695 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646583596102 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.