task 1: China and The US
The line graph gives information about the birth rates of China, and America from 1920 to 2000 and how these rates changed during the 80-year period.
Overall, it is clear that the birth rates of both nations decreased throughout the research given. Additionally, both trends were similar to in terms of a general decline.
The birth rate of the US began at about 11% in 1920 and then fell considerably to under 5% in 1945. 5 years later, there was a sharp increase to exactly 15%, which was its highest point over the period of 80 years. However, the rate experienced a dramatic fall at the end of the period, reaching the final figure at about 7% in 2000.
At the same time, the birth rate in China varied more significantly than in the US. it dropped dramatically to 5% in 1940 despite some fluctuations.The rate of birth remained unchanged from 1940 to 1945 before going up dramatically to become the highest point of the whole line graph at 20%, in 1950. On the contrary, there was a sharp fall in the birth rate of China, ending at approximately 2% in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-28 | hoangquang | 78 | view |
- task 1: relative price changes of three different groups 78
- task 1: the graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 56
- task 1: the birth rate 78
- task 1: the consumption of four different food groups per person per week 73
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping? Is this a positive or negative development? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 148, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...to 5% in 1940 despite some fluctuations.The rate of birth remained unchanged from 1...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55729166667 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61791682417 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6842706281 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2222222222 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102070426286 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0537322582433 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726903498341 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597424753237 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461995579806 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.