task 1: the consumer price index
The line graph compares the changes of three different food groups in terms of relative price from 1979 to 2009 and the overall trend in the consumer price index at the same period.
Overall, it is clear that the prices for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks all increased over the 30-year period. Additionally, the consumer price index experienced a rise, which only was lower than the rise for Fresh fruits and vegetables.
In 1979, the price for the Sugar and sweets began at above 50 and then went up dramatically to almost 120 in next decade. Meanwhile, both Fresh fruits and vegetables and Carbonated witnessed a sharp rise to nearly 150 and about 110 respectively in 1989. At the same starting above 50 in 1979, the consumer price index rose dramatically to roughly 200 after the period of 30 years. It overtook the figure for Sugar and sweets, at approximately 200 and Carbonated drinks, at about 150.
Although the price for Fresh fruits and vegetables fluctuated, it continued to rise sharply by 150, reaching the final figure at 330 in 2009.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | truongquangwt | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | haieric96 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | khoavodoj | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | mohammad.iraf | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | justtheanh | 78 | view |
- task 1: expenditure on income groups 67
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping? Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- task 1 some lands main export 70
- task 1: the amount of Beef, Lamb was eaten over the 25-year period 73
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89784946237 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61492134109 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55376344086 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8227948485 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.875 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241468980601 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119523707894 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106554543812 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168451028145 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783225742019 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.