When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of productivity, and have made us less happy and more stupid because information is not knowledge. Which of these points of view do you agree with most? Support your argument with reasons and/or examples from your own experience and observations.
Introduction of computers into the common mans’ life was widely believed to increase the productivity in the manufacturing field and people will become smarter and have a happier life, whereas skeptics acclaim that computers have proved otherwise. In my opinion, computers have improved the productivity as well as made our life easier in a number of ways.
Current technology and innovations developed with the help of computers have largely improved the manufacturing systems thereby increasing the productivity at an immense rate. The automotive industry is an appropriate example for the automaton processes which have reduced the man power required in the industry to a huge extent. The development in space research is yet another example for the computer era. Our predecessors could not have fathomed the period when man would reach the farthest points of the universe.
However, in some scenarios, it can be judged that computers have made people less smarter, since much of the common human chores and practices have been automated resulting in the public becoming lazier by day. This, in fact is not a permanent effect, but can be avoided with proper intervention and awareness by the authorities.
In conclusion, computers have made people less smarter, though these effects are negligible compared to the giant development in technology which the mankind has made with the help of computers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-05 | Primace | 77 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2019-05-07 | 029ashish@gmail.com | 72 | view |
| 2019-04-16 | ajayaryanone | 77 | view |
| 2019-03-29 | Ammu helen | 77 | view |
- Should we preserve past historical buildings? How much care should be taken by their owners in terms of maintenance? 55
- When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of produc 84
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 55
- Whether English will remain to be the global language despite globalization 76
- Education system that assess the student's learning by written exam is correct? Discuss your view? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less smart'?
Suggestion: less smart
... judged that computers have made people less smarter, since much of the common human chores ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less smart'?
Suggestion: less smart
... conclusion, computers have made people less smarter, though these effects are negligible co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, whereas, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 20.9802955665 33% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 222.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3963963964 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9311416874 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7293170082 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.111111111 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 7.25397266985 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2120785927 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086774150405 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613512257618 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126332887873 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629880392028 0.0609392437508 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.