Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.
To begin with, by emerging cell phone, video games, and social network, students spend a great deal of their time on them instead of studying. Actually, gaming is highly addictive because they are constantly given rewards, new records, and a new level, all of which engage their mind, which most of the time they forget to do their homework. Hence, their homework is sacrificed by a few more hours playing the video games. An example will illustrate this viewpoint much better, When I was a high-school student, my father bought me a video-game, which as a result of my excellent grade in that year. Subsequently, I spent most of my time playing vide-gam that always forgot to do my assignment. That year was very important for me because I had an entrance exam for university. Finally, by spending my time on a video-game, I could not accept in a high-ranked university. For this reason, when I think that year, I would be so upset. Accordingly, the rapid growth of technology brought a lot of games waste students' time.
Secondly, nowadays, students have engaged mentally and physically in the technology and spend less time on their education. In fact, they are always thinking about video-game and social network. By spending a lot of time on a social network, the could find much more friends and spend their time with them. For example, when I was an undergraduate student, I had a part-time job at university campus magazine as a reporter. As I remember, one time, I interviewed professor Nejati, who is a well-known psychologist in my country. He told me that a large number of parents every day come to my office in order to learn how to behave with their children. Because, due to making friends in a social network, their children meet with a stranger and they are concern about this issue. Also, he told me that they are not serious about their education. For this reason, the more they spend their time in the social network, the less they have time to study.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | mashghanbar | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | nusybah | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | dentista1985 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | fafar | 85 | view |
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If a student is having difficulty studying a course, it is better for the student to turn to a friend who is good at this course than to turn to his/her teacher fro help 73
- doing something quickly 70
- Most advertisers make products seem much better than they really are. 83
- Many filmmakers make movies based on books. When a movie is produced based on books, some people prefer to read books before watching films, other people choose to watch the movie first. Which one do you think is better? Why?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 545, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...hologist in my country. He told me that a large number of parents every day come to my office in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, also, finally, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i think, in fact, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72173913043 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71023947754 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513043478261 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3933801441 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.53405017921 44% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249322733658 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875050499957 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722408770818 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204963919577 0.150856017488 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306945870711 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.