Age discrimination occurs when a decision Is made on the person’s age. In workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against old workers be made illegal?
Nowadays, work places are crowded by people of various age groups. These age groups constitute of two main categories - youngsters, with lesser experience and older workers with more experience. However, an unjust balance exists while deciding incentives for employees. This essay will argue that goodies and incentives should not be limited to older employees with extensive experiences rather they should be equally distributed amongst young people. To begin with, youngsters are considered as the backbone and front line of any company, as they possess the energy and drive to excel and boost the production of the company. Therefore, promotions, awards, bonuses etc. extended to this class of employees would not only doubly their morale but also ignite them to work with extra devotion, as the future of the company depends on their input and performance. Moreover, it is the human innate to get praised on every good deed he or she performs and this praisal subsequently proves to be instrumental for professional excelling of an individual. On the other hand, extending of rewards and promotions to the older group of employees would entail demotivation amongst the younger employees, as it would be considered that the higher echelon has reserved all the benefits towards them. Albeit, older employees possess great deal of experience and knowledge; however, owing to their lesser energy levels and being in the last leg of their service they are unable to bear as much as fruitful and beneficial results as compared to hot blooded young employees. Therefore, the higher ups of the company should not limit their decisions towards the older employees but also take into account distribution of requisite incentives among young people in order to boost their morale and increase the efficacy of the company.
- In spite of advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why? what are the solutions?
- Does the advent of internet change the role of teacher? To what extent do you agree? 77
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 55
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- It is as important for school children to study music, art and sport as it is for them to become literate and numerate.' How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and / or examples from your own experience. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ually distributed amongst young people. To begin with, youngsters are considered...
^^
Line 1, column 1051, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rofessional excelling of an individual. On the other hand, extending of rewards ...
^^
Line 1, column 1562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ompared to hot blooded young employees. Therefore, the higher ups of the company...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, therefore, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25517241379 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72360129951 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589655172414 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.11661573 50.4703680194 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.545454545 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125529025823 0.242375264174 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464649117867 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428022597624 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125529025823 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.