The table shows the number of miles of passengers traveled on five types of transport in a European country in 1995 and 2005. It also shows a projection of the year 2015.
The given table illustrates the figures for miles in term of how many these dwellers commuted on five different vehicles in a Western nation in 1995 and 2005. This table also estimates the average distance of each person by five kinds of transport in 2005.
It can clearly be seen from this table, bus was the most common vehicles when the average distance of bus reached the highest point in both 1995 and 2005. However, railway will make up a vast majority of the average distance of commuters travel on.
It is noticeable that from a mere 2 kilometres travel in the airway in 1995, it is expected to increase 10 times in 2015. The rail travel, meanwhile, rising gradually by 10 thousand miles in 2005 estimated to reach at 60 thousand miles. By contrast, travelling by bus experienced a downward trend and continue to be expected to decline by 2015. Furthermore, distances travelled by motorbikes and bicycles were lesser than that of other transports and slightly decline by 3 km and 1 km respectively in 2005, followed by a modest increase n 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | lauranguyen_97 | 48 | view |
| 2018-02-25 | Jewelfish89 | 30 | view |
- The table shows the number of miles of passengers traveled on five types of transport in a European country in 1995 and 2005 It also shows a projection of the year 2015 30
- The pie chart shows information about world resources, and the bar chart shows the utilization of water in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Canada 56
- The pie chart below shows more information about where coffee is produced consumed and where its profit goes 93
- The pie chart shows information about world resources, and the bar chart shows the utilization of water in Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Canada 61
- The pie chart shows information about water resources and the bar chart shows the utilization of water in Egypt Saudi Arabia and Canada 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, rising gradually by 10 thousand miles in 2005 estimated to reach at 60 thousan...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75543478261 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70439828521 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614130434783 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3001457723 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.375 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232164892068 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100633975006 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494109797854 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152816544171 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721164245622 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.