Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role models for youngsters. Give your opinion on this matter.
Today, many youngsters follow celebrities like sports stars and film stars as their role models. This can be seen all over social media. It is disagreed to follow them and this will be considered by taking into account immoral acts of sports personalities and derogatory roles played by film stars.
To begin with, recently many cases have been published of athletes using illegal power boosters like drugs or steroids. This impacts negatively on the minds of his/her follower. For an instance, Lance Armstrong, winner of several Tour de France races, was found guilty of using performance enhancing drugs. Hence, youngsters should be discouraged to follow such sports star.
Secondly, film stars only show their facade to public and not their real life. It is also seen glamorous film stars playing derogatory roles in movies. For an instance, Sanjay Dutt, an Indian actor has played roles of mafia or villain, taking drugs, robbing banks and living a lavish lifestyle. This sets a bad example for adolescents. Also, he has been found guilty in the court of law, for some illegal activity. This exemplifies that such film stars should not be a role model. Youngsters admiration of these personalities should not be supported.
On the other hand, we also see celebrities doing charity and have inspirational talent to showcase. This analysis proves that all successful celebrities may not be role models.
In a nutshell, youngsters should not follow this jazzy personality blindly. It is recommended to teach youth to follow virtuous characters.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-27 | Tamanna_87 | 55 | view |
- Do you think English will remain to be a global language despite globalization? 77
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples. 77
- There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is the most important in our day-to-day life? What are the benefits and detrimental effects of it? 77
- Law can change human behavior. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- Some people think that technology improves the quality of life whereas others feel that creates new problems that threaten the quality of life. Discuss both these views and suggest your opinion? 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.232 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70772524455 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.5024630542 63% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6445503364 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.6666666667 104.977214359 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8888888889 20.9669160288 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 7.25397266985 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306516356256 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979961746802 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984357617746 0.071462118173 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151284309794 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102605333686 0.0609392437508 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 12.6369458128 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.3980295567 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.