hypothesis about ability of an ancient animal that could fly.
The passage talks about the pterosaurs that are kind of ancient group of reptiles, and it clarifies that these animals couldn't flight, and presents three reasons. Although, the lecture has opposite view and refuses each of passage reasons. As a matter of fact, recent research has revealed that the pterosaurs have been capable to flight.
First, the passage mentions that the pterosaurs were kind of the cold-blooded animals and they couldn't produce enough energy for flight like other cold-blooded animals. On the other hand, the lecture exposes, discovery on their fossils reveals that they had dense hair covering on their body. Hence, this is for the warm-blooded animals to maintain their high body temperature in extremely cold conditions. Thus, as the warm-blooded animals can supply enough energy, pterosaurs could supply same energy too. Indeed, they did not have unfavorable problem for flight.
Second, the passage accounts for us, the pterosaurs were so heavy to be able flight, but the lecture has another view. Lecture explains that anatomy features of these animals show, they were light weight compared to their size. There are hollows in their bones that cause they will be light despite their large body. Due to their low weight, they could keep airborne by powered flight. Therefore, those ancient animals had no significant hardship to flight.
Third, the passage says that all animals with powered flight have capacity to take off from ground by jumping with their legs or running to gain speed and then jump. In opposite view, the lecture illustrates that there is distinction between birds and pterosaurs. Birds can jump or run with their hind limbs. Practically, birds have two limbs that push the ground with them to flight, but pterosaurs had four limbs. They used their four limbs to obtained speed and then jump; like bat that is a modern animal. Lecture also depicts that they used their four limbs to push the ground not just back ones. Finally, they did not have any remarkable adversity to run with their four limbs and then flight.
- do you agree or dissagree?video games are efficient for students to learn better in schools. 60
- advantages and disadvantages of paper records and electronic records 90
- do you agree or disagree with the statement? the ability to maintain friendship with small group of people is more important than ability to making new friends. 73
- hypothesis about ability of an ancient animal that could fly. 3
- do you agree or dissagree?some parents believe that video games help students who are between 6-8 years old to study better in schools 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...es, and it clarifies that these animals couldnt flight, and presents three reasons. Alt...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...nd of the cold-blooded animals and they couldnt produce enough energy for flight like o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...atures of these animals show, they were light weight compared to their size. There are hollo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, second, so, then, therefore, third, thus, kind of, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 341.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34811491915 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513196480938 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7448850968 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.05 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0851724371475 0.272083759551 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0311783700964 0.0996497079465 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470320553899 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642624457558 0.162205337803 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311509590263 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.