We are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. They are used in business, hospitals, crime detection and even to fly planes. In which more fields will they be used in future? In this dependence on computers salutary or should be more cautious about their benefits?
Nowadays the amazing speed and accuracy of computers are played a vital role in every human life. A large amount of machine technology is rely on our day to day running life. Hence, this essay also deals that, although it is beneficial to humans in a global perspective, nevertheless its darker sides should not be overlooked.
One the one hand, computers have become an inevitable part of human life. For a clear example, they are presently used used in different fields such as commerce & trade, hospitality, crime detection, education and e-governance. They are most accurate and easy to use with any application if become properly programmed. In future, all government departments countrywide will be interconnected by computers as a result of making governance fast and corruption-free. Transport system will be coordinated by controlled by such technology and reduces all traffic congestion and save our valuable time. Even future wars will be controlled by computers. Thus, the advantages of computers are manifold.
One the other hand, there a certain hidden dangerous associated with computer related atmosphere. For instance, when every activity of government authority is purely interconnected with this technology and any error occurred it will be negatively affects our nations security systems. The main challenge of computers are terrorism and other antisocial elements. The massive usage of computers lead to more and more e-waste simultaneously, it will affect global warming.
To wind up, computers are more important for modern era it will enhance our quality of life. However, it is a double edged blade which has to used with more caution. The absolute dependence of computers are more dangerous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-17 | rahulper90 | 78 | view |
| 2018-04-17 | rahulper90 | 78 | view |
- In recent years, there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement. Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies. Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are 78
- Is it wise for an industry to replace its experienced but old workers with new and young individuals who have less experience? 67
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertisement and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree? 56
- Although more and more people read the news on internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news for the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Even though globalisation brought benefit to many countries its negative side should Not forgotten To what extent do you agree 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'relied'.
Suggestion: relied
...A large amount of machine technology is rely on our day to day running life. Hence, ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 114, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: used
...For a clear example, they are presently used used in different fields such as commerce & ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
...lication if become properly programmed. In future, all government departments countrywide...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, as to, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40148698885 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08615430957 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609665427509 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1135336183 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4705882353 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8235294118 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70588235294 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321332337733 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958237667484 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684155875886 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175557411449 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826591592016 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.