TPO-32
The reading and the lecture are both about the quacker sound. It is the sound occasionally hear in the ocean. The author of the reading has present three theories which could produce sound. However, the lecture casts doubt on the argument made in the article. He is of the opinion that the none of the theory is convincing.
First of all, the author of the reading suggests that the strange sound were the calls of male and female orca whales. He believes that the orca whales are the inhabitant of the area and it would have been produced the sound. This point is challenged by the lecture. He suggests that the orca whale lives in the surface water and sound appears in the deep submarine area. Therefore, it is unlikely that orca whales have produced the sound.
Second, the author suggests that the sound is produced by the giant squid. He adds on this that the giant squid is the intelligent animal. It could be possible that they have the skills to emit the sound while approached the submarine out of curiosity. The lecture refutes this idea. He suggests that the sounds were disappeared for the 20 years of the period and then appeared back. If it had produced by the Giant squid, It would not have disappeared because the giant squids were living continuously.
Third, the author states that the sound was produced by the military technology used by the foreign submarines. However, the lecture, on the other hand, suggests that the submarine could make the sound of the engine. However, there was no report of the presence of the engine sound with the odd sound. Therefore, the idea of the sound produced by the foreign submarines is not true.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-24 | forperfect | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | forperfect | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Shayooooon | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | pritam89 | 71 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | Amin1990 | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children than to spend money on universities.use specific reasons and ex 70
- Do you agree or not? Because people are busy doing so many things, they do very few things well. 60
- TPO-32 65
- TPO-36 3
- TPO-31 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, third, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6941580756 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35944126292 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446735395189 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1026339667 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 68.3 110.228320801 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.55 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432613185449 0.272083759551 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140961700566 0.0996497079465 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842660595268 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271028614164 0.162205337803 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772117678295 0.0443174109184 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.3589403974 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 53.8541721854 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.0289183223 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.33 12.2367328918 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.42419426049 83% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.