governments have a legitimate role to legislate to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their own decisions to smoke or decision is up to the individual level?
As we know that smoking is injurious for health. Where a significant number of people think that governments have a legitimate role to legislate to protect citizens from the harmful effects of their own decisions to smoke, some believe that this decision is up to the individual. This is contentious question where people are having both the notions. This essay will discuss about later mentioned aspect.
There are myriads of arguments in favor of this point that smoking is depends upon personal choice. The most preponderant one is that on the packet of cigarettes, governement already mentioned a picture which clearly defined the consequences of smoking. But still billions of adults are chain smokers who smoke tobacco every day and some people use multiple packets of cigarettes in a day. Consequently, it will not only affect them only but also those people who would be surronding by them after smoke.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that it is a matter of personal choice which start as a general habbit but ultimately people get trapped into this habbit. People are aware that it can cause them throat cancer, if they would not stop this bad habbit in long run. However, still they don't care about this drug. Moreover, its a personal choice as no one can stop anyone to do anything.
In views of arguments outline above, one can conclude that tobacco consumptions is personal choice rather than governement can stop consumer. If we are having something bad after knowing the bad affects on our personal health so its untlimately our decision not anyone else. User will be self responsible for the steps he/she will take.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-26 | ananddeepsingh | 55 | view |
- It is important for the children to study a film at the school to learn literature? To what extent you agree and use example? 77
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldn’t waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, videos and DVDs. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statem 80
- Does television remove loneliness or not 82
- Should University penalize students for late submission of their work? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...habbit in long run. However, still they dont care about this drug. Moreover, its a ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... long run. However, still they dont care about this drug. Moreover, its a persona...
^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...y dont care about this drug. Moreover, its a personal choice as no one can stop an...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 20.9802955665 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96750902527 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58390459738 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58844765343 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2618034783 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7333333333 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 7.25397266985 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205084932878 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639817789842 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156204085924 0.071462118173 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136651757902 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168191056836 0.0609392437508 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.