The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012.
The line chart illustrates the proportion of women as members of parliament in Germany, Italy, France, Belgium and the UK between 2000 and 2012.
Overall, the percentage of women in 5 countries participating in parliament showed an increase over the period, especially the UK with a drastic improvement.
In Germany, starting as the highest among 5 nations with about 33%, the proportion experienced a slight rise and ended at about 12% in 2012. Beginning at only 27%, the percentage of women in Italian parliament dramatically ascended to 38% in 2008 and reached the peak in 2012 with 40%. In France, the proportion showed a steady increase to 32% in 2012, 7% higher than that in 2000.
In 2000, the percentage of parliamentary women In the UK was the lowest among 5 nations with only 3%. However it experienced a drastic rise in the following years, skyrocketing to 18% in the end of the period which was 6 times more than that in 2000. In contrast, after reaching the peak in 2004 with 25%, the percentage of Belgium took a marginal plunge over the period, falling from about 17% on 2000 to the same proportion of that in the UK in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-15 | alifdores | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-07 | Mia Nguyen | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-03 | Chi Nguyen | 67 | view |
| 2018-06-03 | Chi Nguyen | 67 | view |
| 2017-09-27 | lethianhthu | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives information about European people of different age groups who went to gym once a month or more between 1990 and 2010 72
- The chart below gives the information of cinema attendance by age group between 1984 and 2000. 78
- The old tradition of a family having a meal together is disappearing. Why do you think this is happening? How does it affect individuals and the community? 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...he lowest among 5 nations with only 3%. However it experienced a drastic rise in the fo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70149253731 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81696621052 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487562189055 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9020630379 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.125 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26950113737 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122964079188 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625942560488 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175347331887 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344078208911 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.