The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999
The given graph illustrates the figure on different classes of families which live in poor in Australia in 1999.
It is noted that the number of old people who had poor life occupied the lowest percentage in Australia in 1999. On the contrary, sole parent was likely to had low standard and made up the highest proportion on the list.
In 1999, there was only 10 % the poor who was single aged pupil and aged couple (6% and 4% respectively). Surprisingly, sole parent living in poverty standard had the highest position (21%). Single people who had no children was the second highest of the listed with 19%. Couple having children seemed to have better life when they only occupied 12% out of 1,837,000 people. Finally, 21% was a figure of couple with children who lived poor life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-09 | Mubashir123 | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | farmaniefr@gmail.com | view | |
| 2022-08-14 | Hanabi | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | whencanIpassIELTsbyscore7 | view | |
| 2021-12-01 | Elenochka315 | 78 | view |
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialized facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sport facilities that every can use. Do you think this is positive or negative development? 67
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the government pay some or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages? 56
- Some people think that the main benefit of greater international cooperation is in the protection of environment while others think that it is in the world business. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people say that all young people should have full-time education until they are 18 years old. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- Some people think that young people should go to university to further their education while others think that they should be encouraged to work as car mechanic or builder, etc to serve society. Discuss both opinion and give your own opinion. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, so, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 644.0 965.302439024 67% => OK
No of words: 137.0 196.424390244 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70072992701 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.42121322205 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4173374338 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591240875912 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 189.9 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 15.190457531 43.030603864 35% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.5 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153671479771 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763004333266 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850404057661 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146194091194 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0960803950244 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.