In today’s world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
It is true that automation impacts has been spreading rapidly in terms of life and cultures, while, many entertainer like singers, drawers, and authors need the support and encouragement from the people is inevitable. In this essay explain the key concern of this statement because, such experts has the ability to flourish common people level of thinking and which lead to humanity and reality of life to the core.
Firstly, ingenious development has the ability to creative thinking by the help of information super highway would have been easiness of the works and outcomes. Nevertheless, attributes of this would not be helpful to the people those who connected for the reality.For example, earlier, people are generated to do work along with the companion and real world, where as today many graphic designers are replace the value of painters by the technical support. However, the real painters have the ability to express feelings and natural amenities to the paintings from their experience and follow up of years. By the virtue of that would help the viewers understand, feel the actuality and irrespective of ready made graphic pictures the real paintings have the soul and purity to explain to.
Secondly, other celebrities like minstrel and scribes performance are explain to the world which innovative technology cannot, for example, musician, they would include the words and lyrics to emphasize ones emotions to express and vanish too. Mean while writers could elaborate human kind and compasion through literature to re think the readers attitudes towards the society and surroundings to some extent. Where as, science and technology explain the situation as videos and so on but that would not touch the people mind which compared to novels, stories, or travelogue.
In conclusion, novel world can express exaggerating reality, notwithstanding, artisans would help the society seems to the frame of mind in go through with them enjoy, live, accept and there by help to opt for the truth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | Anoopben | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | Mario Nese | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | TOANTRAN | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | huynhhongtram | 60 | view |
| 2019-03-19 | lamnhathuy | 89 | view |
- Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field as long as they are playing well Do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Many individuals prefer to talk online with their peers than going with individuals in surrounding networks do you think the benefis exceed the odds 61
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today's society.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013 55
- The maps below show Pebbleton 20 years ago and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ple those who connected for the reality.For example, earlier, people are generated ...
^^^
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...long with the companion and real world, where as today many graphic designers are replac...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'replaced'.
Suggestion: replaced
...ere as today many graphic designers are replace the value of painters by the technical ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ewers understand, feel the actuality and irrespective of ready made graphic pictu...
^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'explained'.
Suggestion: explained
...ke minstrel and scribes performance are explain to the world which innovative technolog...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...clude the words and lyrics to emphasize ones emotions to express and vanish too. Mea...
^^^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: MEAN_WHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meanwhile'?
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...nes emotions to express and vanish too. Mean while writers could elaborate human kind and ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...ociety and surroundings to some extent. Where as, science and technology explain the sit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he frame of mind in go through with them enjoy, live, accept and there by help to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1692.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23839009288 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73035879465 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582043343653 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.4102522453 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.2 106.682146367 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3 20.7667163134 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0884407905612 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323046872687 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266012448517 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0498686030325 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145327453871 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.