Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoox, while others think that zoos are both entertaining and ecologically important.
Discuss both views.
Many people argue that government should keep animals in zoos, while others think that animals should be free in wild forests. Personally, both views bring some benefits.
First of all, wildlife will be freer if they live in forests. They have fresh air and chase other animals. Moreover, they will not be limitted in a scope, but they can move in a free way. They can grow better in natural conditions. For example, they live in a flock, so they can share food and learn some skills from other members. Especially, they are not isolated from other fellow-creatures so they will not feel bored and lone. By contrast, animal in zoos might live lonely in their cages throughout their life, which can be the most awful with any animals.
However, keeping animal in zoos will protect them against hunters, bad weather and exhaustion of food. Animal in zoos will be looked after carefully and they will not be hunted to make food, clothes. They are feeded everyday and cured whenever their health have problems. Especially extinct wildlife, keeping them in zoos is a necessary solution to avoid vanish. In addition, a diversity of species in zoos help people watch them to entertain and research about biology, which make people gain much more knowledge about enviroment and nature.
All in all, keeping animal in zoos has some benefits but wildlife developing in natural enviroment also has much value. Depending on each situation government should have some appropriate solutions to preserve many species of animal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | anhoanguyenquin | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | yen070998 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-22 | thuy vi tran | 84 | view |
| 2018-06-25 | www.www | 56 | view |
- The map below is of the town of Canterburry. A new school (S) is planned for the area. The map shows two possible sites for the school 61
- Failure is proof that the desire wasn't strong enoughTo what extent do you agree with this statement? 61
- The process shows diamonds moving from the mine to the retailer 78
- The graph shows the hours spent in different study methods during a two year course 61
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment.What can governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nally, both views bring some benefits. First of all, wildlife will be freer if ...
^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a free way" with adverb for "free"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... limitted in a scope, but they can move in a free way. They can grow better in natural condit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an be the most awful with any animals. However, keeping animal in zoos will pro...
^^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... to make food, clothes. They are feeded everyday and cured whenever their health have pr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...knowledge about enviroment and nature. All in all, keeping animal in zoos has s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1278.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05138339921 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4701754875 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577075098814 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 387.9 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4469233503 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.875 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8125 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197912061633 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657303580718 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598311120261 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147021672351 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859304232359 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.