Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoos while others think that zoos are both entertaining and ecologically important.Discuss both views

Essay topics:

Some people believe that it is wrong to keep animals in zoos while others think that zoos are both entertaining and ecologically important.
Discuss both views

In modern society, perspectives of how to keep animals are varied between many people. Someone think that caging animals in zoos is the most effective way to protect them, while other think that it is illogical to limit their movement. Now I am going to discuss both views following different perspectives.

Some people prove that keeping animals in zoos is acceptable. Firstly, caging them in zoos help people to protect animals against predators, bad weather and illegal hunting. Zoos play an important role in wild-life conservation by allowing scientists to research animals behaviour to take after endangered species more effectively. Moreover, according to economic reason, zoos provide a lot of jobs opportunities by employing many people and raise income for local area. That money can be used for conservation projects that protect more species. In personal perspective, zoos are interesting, educational and fun. Many families spend their weekend or holiday in zoos. By visiting them, children have chance to learn and appreciate wild life and nature.

On the other hand, many people says that keeping animals in zoos is unsuitable with modern awareness about nature. Because zoos are artificial environment in which animals are supplied all conditions to maintain their lives. That means animals can lose their natural instinct to hunt for food. Animals have right to move freely and experience normal life in natural habitats. In addition, governments should invest the money in improving natural habitats in their nations instead of spending huge amount of money to preserve some certain creatures from extinction. Next, it is immoral to use animals as means of entertainment. Keeping them in cage is unethical and cruel. People have no right to deprive independence of any species with the aim of profit.

In summary, in my point of views, beside animals are not vulnerable creations, they have right to survive independently because of having feelings ans emotions as humans.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-30 anhoanguyenquin 56 view
2019-08-06 yen070998 84 view
2019-05-22 thuy vi tran 84 view
2018-06-25 www.www 56 view
Essays by user yen070998 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...are varied between many people. Someone think that caging animals in zoos is the most...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'Someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...are varied between many people. Someone think that caging animals in zoos is the most...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ble with modern awareness about nature. Because zoos are artificial environment in whic...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, in summary, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35555555556 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78289053285 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6907851976 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.35 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303232358671 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875896821472 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850591959431 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173053142894 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993431283325 0.056905535591 175% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.