The three Pie Charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK School in 1981, 1991 and 2001
The given circular charts reveal the information about the yearly amount spent by a UK School, on distinct parameters during the three years: 1981, 1991 and 2001. The data is calibrated in per centum.
As is observed from the given illustration, there are five main parameters on which School spent its expenditure; insurance, teacher's salaries, furniture and equipments, resources and other worker's salaries.
It can be seen that, only a tiny fraction (2%) from school's budget spent on insurance, whereas, one fourth of the total money spent on giving salaries to the teachers by the year of 1981. In addition to this, less than a fifth of the total money spent on furniture and equipments as well as the same amount of money spent on resources; like books in the Year of 1981. Moreover, 28% money of school had been spent on other worker's salaries.
As far as the trend was concerned, there was a minor increasing Trend in the expenditure of insurance by the year of 1991 and 2001. Apart from all this, salaries given to teachers upsurged to 10% in 1991, and then, fell 5% by the year of 2001. Surprisingly, there was a huge difference in expenditure of furniture and equipments; 5% in the year of 1991 and 23% in the year 2001. Moreover, the amount of money that had spent by a UK School on other workers salaries during the years of 1991 and 2001 are 22% and 15% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silk worm and stages in the production of silk cloth 89
- The three Pie Charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK School in 1981, 1991 and 2001 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, then, well, whereas, apart from, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70491803279 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67062212243 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47131147541 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8120467357 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.8 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174002594677 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812626270319 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756568789677 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121250259423 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850020522409 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.