TPO 48
In this set of materials the reading passages discusse that the population of frogs that have a lot of helpful and positive effect in the natural environment and also especially on human life, is in serious trrable. Ant suggested some solution for this problem. While, in the listening the ptofessor casts doubt on what is peresented in the text and believes that non of the porposed solution is not practical.
First of all, in the text it is clearly mentioned that the pesticides damage tyo nerves system of frongs and it led to kill them, thus through decrease is uses of this chemical materials can prevent from this declin. However, the professor claims that yhis way is not economical practical. Because the farmers used this pesticides to improve quality of their products and increase in among of crops. And without pesticides they should be lossing the among of high quyality product and it is not economical for them.
In addition, the professor disagree with this idea that using antifungal medication to protect frogs from attack by fungus. She says that this solution is not practical because they should be captur each frog individual and treatment them with this antifungal. In addition, they should be reapite this treatment for each new generation so this method is very expensive and is not parctical.
Finally, in the twext it is stated that the frogs habit is threatend by human activities and drying the wetlands by humans for development. The professor subscribes that drying up of wetlands is the result of golobal worming not human activities.
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 83
- TPO 40 73
- Do you agree or not?Because people are busy doing so many things, they do very few things well. 76
- TPO 52 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 316, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...cal practical. Because the farmers used this pesticides to improve quality of their ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...lly, in the twext it is stated that the frogs habit is threatend by human activities ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f golobal worming not human activities.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, so, thus, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1311.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00381679389 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65210054809 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541984732824 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3804782819 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248551638941 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090282616179 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726957493202 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140482947517 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233230384382 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.