Universities marks deduct who students are late. Give your opinion and examples.
At university, students are commonly assessed through individual or group assignments. These assignments are always time limited and marks are deducted when students fail to meet the deadlines. This essay will argue that while such punishment is strict and imposes pressure on students, it is mandatory to do so.
To begin with, due date requires students to manage their time effectively and avoid procrastination. Penalty is an effective way to gain students commitment on completing the tasks within the time frame. For instance, while working on multiple projects at the same time, students are self – control on their timetable. To avoid losing marks, they are more likely to plan their schedule and assign a reasonable amount of time for the task. By meeting the deadlines, students demonstrate their commitment in completing tasks and good time management strategy.
Secondly, opponents might argue that some tasks are challenging for some students, and consequently, students should not be penalised for delay submission. However, it is unfair to treat those who submit their assignments on time as those who fail to do so. In fact, most universities provide assistance to students in completing their assignments. To clarify, students are free to discuss with each other or their professors. There are other services to help with other aspects of the assignment such as writing essay, statistical analysis or software demonstration. Thus, while penalty puts pressure on students, it also encourages them to employ proven study aids to complete their assignment.
To conclude, this essay has argued that students should receive penalties when they fail to submit their assignment on time. Such punishment ensures students commitment on sufficiently using all available resources offered by university to carry out the given task efficiently.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-04 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2023-01-21 | woutan | 93 | view |
| 2023-01-11 | Yuli | 80 | view |
| 2022-04-14 | ots1 | 77 | view |
- Artificial intelligent robots are increasingly taking human jobs. 85
- Some people think law changes human behaviour. Do you agree or disagree? 72
- Tourism industry is benefit for any country or not 77
- Tourism industry is benefit for any country or not 77
- Whether experiential learning learning by doing0 can work well in formal education agree or disagree OR experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books agree or disagree 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47038327526 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94715441433 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581881533101 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.5463707791 50.4703680194 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.125 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.25397266985 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133802498333 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516815049825 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429463024717 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917639305303 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210647901909 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.