Cohabitation is believed to bring huge advantages for young people since it enables them to fully understand each other before deciding to get married.
Marriage and kids are not for everyone and this is why couples increasingly prefer cohabitation, that is living together and having a sexual relationship without being married. Couples cohabit, rather than marry, for a variety of reasons. The foremost is to test their compatibility before deciding to get married.
Cohabitation is now the norm among young couples. In recent times, the number of couples in cohabit almost quadrupled. Many couples believe cohabitation will lower their risk of divorce as they will get the required time to fully understand each other. There are no legal formalities or rights or responsibilities to deal with. You can very well know your partner’s demeanor, conduct and character. It is a sort of test before marriage. That is why cohabitation is rising.
Some reports reveal no positive effects from cohabiting since most of the cohabit couples are the children of divorce, or have other family members or friends who have divorced. Their reasons for living together include avoiding formalities with legal marriage, convenience, financial savings. Some studies indicate that on average, marriage preceded by cohabitation is 46% more likely to end in divorce. It is believed that cohabitation carries all the worries of marriage without any of the benefits. It gets worse when one of the partner becomes ill or requires hospitalization or long-term care.
I disagree with this notion and in my view, “Cohabitation” is a misconception. I believe those who cohabitate are at a higher risk for divorce. To conclude, cohabit may be right for some people, others should make the best choice for themselves and their future.
- Should animals be kept in zoos or are they better living in their natural habitat 82
- What are the pros and cons of extreme sports? 85
- Some people think that placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. 77
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? (Discussion Essay) 77
- Medical technology is responsible for the longevity of human life. Is it a curse or a blessing? To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 71, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e effects from cohabiting since most of the cohabit couples are the children of divorce, or...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, so, well, sort of, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33962264151 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20506896496 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630188679245 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.6157635468 195% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0627594077 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6111111111 104.977214359 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7222222222 20.9669160288 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 7.25397266985 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273841762495 0.242375264174 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796132100999 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592293301159 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165451934279 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280147193022 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 12.6369458128 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 53.1260098522 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.1 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.