The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010
The two maps illustrate significant changes of the road system connected with the city hospital from 2007 to 2010.
Overall, the road system was modernized with the construction of two roundabouts. It is also noticeable that a new parking car was built to the east of the medical center.
In 2007, the city hospital which was surrounded by a ring road could be accessed through hospital road connecting this center to the city road. There were two lines of bus stops, three of which were on both sides of the hospital road. In addition, a car park for staff and public was situated to the south – east of the health center.
In 2010, the hospital road was modified with two roundabouts at the entrance and the exit. Also, there was a new bus station which linked to two roundabouts by two minor roads. The car park on the left side of hospital road remained unchanged, but it was for private use only. The public had to use the new parking place to the east of city hospital instead.
- the chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 73
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- the chart shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 47
- The chart shows the annual GDP growth rates in 3 countries from 2007 to 2010 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 185, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
...roundabouts by two minor roads. The car park on the left side of hospital road remai...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53631284916 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43202266576 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502793296089 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.0058323884 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.2 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37493138846 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160996633779 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13667846433 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261059053569 0.15604864568 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127321119494 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.