Some people think that there should be strict laws to control the amount of noise a person makes because of the disturbance it causes to people
Discuss both advantages and disadvantages
Nowadays, noise pollution has been raising many concerns for people. Hence, the government should create strict policies to limit the noise people generate in the community. This essay will explore the merits and drawbacks of this.
First of all, noise is now a major concern in most communities, especially in urban areas where noise produced by construction workers using heavy machinery, honking of cars, music and over population and the order of the day. This level of noise causes lots of distraction, stress, headaches, and in the long run can lead to hearing difficulties. If the government ensure strict laws to prohibit avoidable sounds and excessive noise making in the community will lead to more productivity among workers as they will be able to focus on their work and as well as reducing the risk of becoming deaf in the future. For example, a recent study proved that individuals that get exposed to over 20 decibels of noise on a daily basis are likely to develop tinnitus, which is a perception of ringing or sounds in the ear, and eventually deafness.
On the other hand, if the government gives strict rules to control the level of noise people make. This will cause development to slow down. First, the rate at which building are constructed to meet the rapid development of the community will reduce. For instance, a building company using heavy machinery do so, to meet up with delivery time as well as to deliver a fine project. Secondly, it is quite difficult to restrict the amount of noise a person makes. After all it is their right to make noise. For example, it will be unfair to limit the noise people make when they are celebrating.
To conclude, the merits of reducing noise are that people will become productive due to less interferences in their work and the chances of suffering from deafness will be reduced. While, the drawbacks are that, it may be unnecessary due to the rate of development and may violate human right.
- It's generally believed that success in fields such as art and sport can only be achieved if a person has natural talent. However, it's sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or artist.Discuss both these views and gi 61
- Wealthy nations should assist poor countries with humanitarian relief during naional disaster. do you agree or disagree? 67
- Scientists have been warning for many years that to protect the environment, we have to limit the use of energy in our daily lives. Despite warning many people do not pay attention to this.What are the reasons for this and how can people be encouraged to 67
- According to a recent study, the more time people use the Internet, the less time they spend with real human beings. Some people say that instead of seeing the Internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities world-wide, we should be concer 78
- Some people say that the current level of air travel is acceptable where as other people believe air travel should be reduced and the government should play a role in this Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 462, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ict the amount of noise a person makes. After all it is their right to make noise. Fo...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 89, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun interferences is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...at people will become productive due to less interferences in their work and the cha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, after all, as to, for example, for instance, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85163204748 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65182636651 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545994065282 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.764613395 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.1875 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213164671003 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735236599378 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632918125246 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128818272333 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437644585678 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.