Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes, is one of the most widely-used drugs in the world. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long term health costs are high - for smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of health care costs and lost productivity.
Do governments have a legitimate role to legislate to protest citizens from the harmful effects of their own decisions to smoke, or are such decisions up to the individual ?
Tobacco is one of the most widely consumed drugs in the world today. Over a billion people smoke cigarette and this effects their health. Eventually, the health costs of smoking cigarettes are really high because it causes life-threatening diseases. To curb this menace both governments and individuals have an instrumental role to play.
Firstly, people who smoke cigarette not only harm themselves but also are a cause of passive smoking for the people in their environment. Moreover, individuals are influenced by their role models for picking up this bad habit. For example, when people see their favourite movie stars and heroes smoke cigarette they get quite influenced and start smoking. As a result, this negatively affects both the individuals and wider community. Smoking results in heart problems and even cancer, and this results in high health costs in the long term. Also, as the government cover for the medical expenses of the individuals in many countries it affects the wider community because these expenses are covered from the taxes paid by the citizens.
Hence, individuals must understand the disadvantages of smoking and quit this habit.
Governments can also play a critical role in order to protect the citizens from the bad effects of smoking and help them quit cigarette. At the outset, the government can levies taxes on the sales of cigarettes to reduce its consumption. Additionally, it must conduct awareness initiatives and drives to educate the people on harmful effects of smoking. This can help reduce the number of smokers.
To recapitulate, both government and individuals need to play their part in preventing this habit and make the world a safe and secure place to live in.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-01 | Rahul Luthra | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | Sidra018 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | edsonsimoes | 55 | view |
- Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person's age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against older 77
- More and more students are studying at universities abroad, either because it is cheaper or because they feel they can receive a better education, or because it will provide them with greater professional opportunities.Discuss the advantages and disadvant 85
- Some people only have pets to not feel lonely, for example, but they don’t always take proper care of them. Do you think people who don’t always take proper care of their pets should be allowed to keep them? 55
- Schools should prepare students for university, rather than for work. How far do you agree with this statement ? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 77
- Environmental problems are too great to be managed by individuals so real change can only be achieved at government level To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Support your point of view with reasons and or examples from your own 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 171, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'levy'
Suggestion: levy
...ette. At the outset, the government can levies taxes on the sales of cigarettes to red...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, really, so, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22661870504 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82610449591 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532374100719 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3635613458 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8125 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184834761325 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663364683386 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740488012304 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903128308309 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881221817066 0.0609392437508 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.