The diagram below illustrates the carbon cycle in nature
The given diagram illustrates the sources of originating CO2 and the nature cycle of carbon in both the surrounding atmosphere and under the ground.
Firstly, CO2 is originated from the respiration of both plants and animals combined with the emissions from auto and factory when fossil fuels energy are burnt. Moreover, by using the organic carbon, the plants photosynthesize to create energy to sustain lives.
Secondly, after a progession of time underground, decay organism of plants, animals and waste products become fertilizer, which helps to enrich the level of carbon in the environment. In addition, an amount of carbon is trapped in fossils and fossil fuels, while another proportion is received as the ocean uptake. Furthermore, the roots of plants also help add CO2 emission through the respiration process.
Overall, with this replenishment cycle, the level of CO2 of the entire world remain constantly for an extended period. Additionally, the CO2 emissions existed in the air and underground are both originated from organic and non-organic sources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops. 89
- The world s most urgent problem is caused by over population Do you agree or disagree 94
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos ...) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Most government money should be invested in teaching science rather than any other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress? To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45180722892 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95341116983 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614457831325 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5676280955 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.125 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 5.23603664747 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151968848726 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714475511881 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125957469108 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123915016752 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159022989149 0.0819641961636 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.