Many historical sites and museums are mainly visited by tourist but not local people. Why is this the case, and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Many historical sites and museums have a significant success in attraction tourists. However, they fail to increase the number of local visitors. This problem is caused by several factors and some effective solutions should be produced to deal with this trend.
There are several reasons why many museum and historical sites are not frequency visited by local people. Firstly, since local people are living in city which have historical sites and museums, many individuals might believe that they already have a good understanding about their traditional customs and history. As a result, they might find it uninterested in paying a visit to these places. Additionally, because exhibit which are showing in museums is extremely rare and have a high historical value, museum’s administration might need a large amount of money to invest in maintenance and guard. Therefore, beside the government’s investment, they might have some activities which could earn money. For example, money could be earned by the entrance ticket, they do not allow to bring sustenance but they might sell quite expensive food and drink in their campus. All of these reasons support the point that why native people have less interest in museums and historical sites.
Several actions can be taken to increase the amount of native visitors. The first solution would be to make it more interesting or create motivation for local visitors. This can be done by organizing events or celebration which are related to exhibits. Additionally, the museum’s administration should find and create new exhibitions every couple season. Secondly, the special programs for local people could be one of the most effective solution such as the reducing food and drink cost or free entrance on special days for local people program. The final solution would be to use a significant beneficial effects of advertisement. To illustrate, resident visitors are provided an essential information by promoting and introducing local museums and historical sites in media. Moreover, launch campaigns might help local people have a good understanding of historical value, this could encourage people to pay a visit in these places.
In conclusion, the shortage of inhabitant visiting local museum and historical sites happen because of a variety factors and several actions need to be taken to solve this trend.
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Many historical sites and museums are mainly visited by tourist but not local people. Why is this the case, and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 31, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun museum seems to be countable; consider using: 'many museums'.
Suggestion: many museums
...s trend. There are several reasons why many museum and historical sites are not frequency ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 790, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'bringing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: bringing
... the entrance ticket, they do not allow to bring sustenance but they might sell quite ex...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ould be to use a significant beneficial effects of advertisement. To illustrate, reside...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2008.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38337801609 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93455853707 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498659517426 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 640.8 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1632055998 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.684210526 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6315789474 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57894736842 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390064037806 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127393388315 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974377649663 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249747238413 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040848723324 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.