Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today's society.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Experts throughout the developing and developed world have debated whether the use of advertising skills is beneficial to our society or not. In spite of boosting the sales figures, the waste pollutants begot by commercials is now increasingly recognised by the public. This essay will discuss both views and use the examples from Hong Kong to demonstrate points.
To begin with, commercials that are shown on various media is intuitively perceived as a key of managing a business. The central reason behind this stems from the fact that the features of a product can be effectively promulgated, which then boosts its sales. In fact, the majority of manufacturers in Hong Kong purchased the prime time of TV channels for hosting their advertisement last year. Moreover, the colour and vibrancy of commercials, to a considerable extent, embellish our cities. Therefore, it is conclusively clear that the employment of advertising skill is likely to foster societal development.
Although there is a case for advertisement benefiting a thriving economy, its ensuing production of waste cannot be neglected. This is largely because the images that are shown on these commercials are often more palatable and overstated, which in turn tempt customers into purchasing goods that are deemed redundant to them. For instance, the Consumer Council established that there has been evidently a surge in lodging complaints about misleading information on TV commercials over the past decades. Consistent with this line of thinking, the waste such as packing papers, plastic bags and the product itself would have significantly reduced if the content of commercials were supervised. Thus, it is possible to state beyond doubt that the manipulation of advertising skills tends to weaken the effort spent on environmental protection.
In conclusion, the existence of commercials has a pivotal role to play in societal growth and business expansion, yet its downside regarding the far-reaching consequence of waste pollution outweigh its advantages. Given the increasing awareness on environmental protection, it is predicted that the use of advertising skills will be restricted in the foreseeable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-04 | RockyGagKy | 89 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | RockyGagKy | 89 | view |
| 2018-08-18 | eyraen | 84 | view |
- Should state museums charge visiting fees or that should be completely free?What is your viewpoint on this issue?Give reasons for your answer. 84
- Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clean up the pollution that they produce, not the government. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that schools have to be more entertaining, while others think that their sole purpose is to educate. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 11
- The table below gives information about rail transport in four countries in 2007. 11
- The presence of technology in the classroom has become more and more apparent and offers students tremendous resources with which to supplement their education. Given time, technology will completely replace the traditional teacher in the classroom.Do you 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: IT_IS[7]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...tisement benefiting a thriving economy, its ensuing production of waste cannot be n...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50887573964 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19219664081 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609467455621 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4303483701 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.133333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104216367562 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034051464275 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0214942680103 0.0667982634062 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0629261592537 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150565455405 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.