It has recently been announced that a large shopping center may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Considering the establishment of a large shopping center in my neighborhood, I strongly incline to disagree with that. Although a large shopping center can be ascribed as a main advantage to buy any commodity, there are lot of problems which lead to enormous difficulties. To elaborate more on the topic mentioned, the following reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, the establishment of a large shopping center will absolutely in conjunction with traffic problems. It goes without saying that a large amount of people from different area of city will come to my neighborhood for shopping. It is obvious that the preference to use own cars instead of public cars, increases remarkably, nowadays. If the parking of the shopping center cannot provide enough space for automobile of its customers, the accumulation of parked vehicles in the neighborhood will anticipate. In addition, even the parking of the large shopping center provides sufficient space, the pathway of my neighborhood will be captured by the cars of customers who want to enter the complex. Thus, if I have to do a partial job, I encounter serious problems associated with the traffic.
Another primary reason of my disagreement can be attributed to the noise pollution. Needless to say, all large shopping centers can be described as the business location for entrance of the trucks which transfer a large amount of commodities. The presence of huge vehicles can bring about unbearable noise. Besides, regarding the advertisement of some products in the shopping center which use large amplifiers to transmit the voice, the loud voices can be indicated as another issue.
Aside from the point I made about, the possibility to decrease the cost of my home by the establishment of a large shopping center increases. Being one of the most proliferated known municipality problem, crowded complexes such a shopping center are recognized as a main cause for reduction of the home value.
To recapitulate, I cannot disagree more about the establishment of a large shopping center in my neighborhood regarding the traffic problems, the noise pollution, and the reduction of my home value. To my best knowledge, it is more advisable to construct the shopping centers in far area from large cities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Andres01 | 65 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | dew2222 | 70 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | gaoxiangluke | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Orwell1984 | 76 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | bahram1993 | 76 | view |
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 73
- When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success." Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position. 85
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- If you were asked to send one thing representing your country to an international exhibition, what would you choose? Why? Use specific reasons and details to explain your choice. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, regarding, so, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 369.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21409214092 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09744361001 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49593495935 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6240866456 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.176470588 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20025775111 0.236089414692 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754188659627 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335095307207 0.0737576698707 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127230802904 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021751101864 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.