THE BEST WAY TO RESOLVE THE INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS IS TO INCREASE THE COST OF FUEL
Nowadays, pollution environment is global problem which should be resolved as soon as possible. Many solutions have been provided by experts or the leads of nation all over the world.
While I agree that increasing the cost of fuel is just one of the way to resolve the international environmental problems but I still believe that there are still a lot of solutions for this instant problem. However, increasing the cost of fuel is the easy way to proceed right now. Because, it is obvious that fuel is an essential factor of human civilization, thus everyone has to spend their finance for it. For instance, people produce a vast amount of gas for human activities such as transportation, industrial zones, residential areas. Hence, people need to pay for it any cost to support their life and keep their work. Thus, using car will be reduced and people try to use public transportation which should be upgraded by using alternative energy. And CO2 which will be decreased is the greenhouse gases. In addition, using alternative resources help humans save a great amount fossil fuel which is running out of day by day.
On the other hands, using fossil fuel is also able to have a negative on our health, especially in developing countries people are often infected with dangerous diseases from using fossil fuel. Beside alternative energy sources which consist of: wind, solar, electricity, so on,… is environmentally – friendly products. So people should be persuaded to use instead of fossil fuel. It is hard to find because people need tons of money and time for science technology.
Therefore this solutions need contributing with nations on this planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-28 | Anh Thi | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- The range of technology is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor other think it has an opposite effect 80
- THE BEST WAY TO RESOLVE THE INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS IS TO INCREASE THE COST OF FUEL 78
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 80
- THE BEST WAY TO RESOLVE THE INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS IS TO INCREASE THE COST OF FUEL 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 278, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...sist of: wind, solar, electricity, so on,… is environmentally – friendly products....
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...money and time for science technology. Therefore this solutions need contributing with n...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 11, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...time for science technology. Therefore this solutions need contributing with nation...
^^^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntributing with nations on this planet.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, as for, as to, for instance, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03249097473 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82906293239 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613718411552 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3110712046 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236399954329 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775280856182 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124249642552 0.0667982634062 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104316566607 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951074016027 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.