The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that every individual has privilege to owe a car whereas others argue ownership should be limited to one per family. In my perspective, one car per family clause will help to reduce the traffic congestion and pollution.
Firstly, every country suffering from pollution and traffic congestion has number of cars about sixty percent of total vehicles. For instance, people in Calgary have to suffer an hour traffic jam every day and a survey conducted by Department of Road (DOR), Calgary has shown that cars occupied seventy percent of road area during traffic congestion. In addition, most of the Calgary family has more than two cars that run every day. Moreover, DOR, Calgary extrapolated that if the number of cars can be limited to one per family, traffic congestion will decrease to ten to fifteen minutes only.
Secondly, if the numbers of cars, occupying more than fifty percent of road area, reduces, emission of Carbon dioxide decreases which is the major source of air pollution. In a research conducted by one of the universities of USA, it has found that restricting the number of cars to one per family minimizes the air pollution to 2.3 unit from 4.7 unit. Not only air pollution, but also decreases the pollution of sound, water, and so forth.
In a nutshell, nevertheless cars comfort our lifestyle, they are the major sources of pollution and traffic congestion. Thus, restricting cars to one per family decreases the pollution and road congestion and eventually creates livable environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-03 | vijaymehta31 | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-10 | ddk0014 | 77 | view |
| 2018-10-04 | Hari Sharma | 77 | view |
| 2018-06-19 | hoandang | 85 | view |
| 2018-06-12 | Kushi | 77 | view |
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What’s your opinion? Good or bad? 77
- 1 What ways do you suggest to encourage the usage of public transport among the people 65
- How has social media brought about cultural change in people s mindsets 85
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? 77
- What is your view on the idea that it takes failure to achieve success? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10317460317 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72658034226 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535714285714 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9303111942 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.909090909 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6363636364 7.25397266985 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317081692147 0.242375264174 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13682046751 0.0925447433944 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936100766399 0.071462118173 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219077314731 0.151781067708 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907482570303 0.0609392437508 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.