All children should learn to speak a foreign language as soon as they start school. ‘How far do you agree with this proposal?’
It is an inescapable fact that children can benefit considerably from learning how to use a foreign language at an early age. However, it seems unwise to force all of them to start learning a language when they first attend school, and I will explain why in this essay.
On the one hand, it would appear that there are two main advantages that children would gain from learning a foreign language. Firstly, it can be denied that young learners tend to learn to use a language faster compared to adult ones. In fact, this may enable them to master this language more easily, potentially resulting in them speaking such language naturally. Secondly, it is undeniable that kids appear to have more free time which could be used to learn foreign languages. Examples can be seen in many Vietnamese kids, who are able to either join in English clubs at school or watch movies in English in their spare time.
On the other hand, there are two primary reasons why not all kids are encouraged to attend language courses. The most widely-observed fact would be that taking a foreign language course might be unaffordable for numerous children who are living in poverty. Those who support this idea point to the evidence that in many rural regions in Vietnam, a majority of young pupils have to do household chores or even work as a farmer to support their families financially. Another well-known factor would be that foreign languages do not interest all young learners, as such students may be passionate about other subjects such as sports. Therefore, it is surely unwise to force these kids to participate in language classes which they have motivation to go to.
In conclusion, whereas it is almost universally accepted that it is incredibly beneficial for children to learn a foreign language as soon as possible, this idea seems to be somewhat inadequate for kids whose families cannot afford language course or children who are keen on other things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-25 | nguyenana611 | 73 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and gi 84
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 84
- Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this.Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach you own conclusion o 78
- Some people feel that boarding schools are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 84
- Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity. How far do you share this viewpoint? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90060240964 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63225268037 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527108433735 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.0713227507 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.153846154 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5384615385 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249907814966 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090613055208 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493727252333 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170228483782 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438711911159 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.