Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clean up the pollution that they produce, not the government.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The problem of environmental pollution and how to avert its detrimental consequences have been gaining a great deal of concern day by day. More importantly, whether the government or the people and businesses are to shoulder the responsibility to clean it up has turned into a controversy over time, which we will elaborate on both sides of this matter in the following paragraphs. As far as I am concerned, the government having the community collaborated, the financial accountability for alleviating pollution falls on the government in any country.
On the one hand, some people hold the opinion that pollution mainly roots in individuals’ and businesses’ indifference towards the environment. This group accuse people and companies of being inconsiderate and reluctant to do their part in conserving the environment regardless of numerous regulations set by the officials and unwilling to suffer the inconvenience arisen from the laws. Accordingly, it must be them who have to take the financial responsibility for saving the environment.
On the other hand, some people argue that it is considered amongst the government’s essential duties to take tough measures so as to abate pollution. Apparently, this outlook on the issue rides on a couple of different factors the most tangible of which is that the government has enough budget to carry out eco-friendly projects. Take utilizing green sources of energy or state-of-the-art methods to dispose of dangerous waste as an example. By the virtue of sufficient financial support, which must be provided by the government, one can easily adopt green approaches in an attempt to clean up or even prevent further pollution to the environment.
I for one, side with the attitude of having the government take care of the environment through providing the businesses with enough financial support and rising people’s awareness of how to play their role on the issue.
To summarize, there seem to be two different approaches to which party must take the responsibility of financial support to save the environment by removing the pollutants away from it. I strongly believe that the government has to budget for cleaning up the pollution. Only in this way can we prevent a catastrophic future of many and varied diseases brought about by dangerous pollutants in the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-19 | lakhveer khokhar | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-29 | elhamsalimi2010 | 48 | view |
- is law beneficial or not? 11
- There are a lot of inventions nowadays, which invention do you think is more important in our day-to-day lifestyle? 85
- Some people think that companies and private individuals should pay to clean up the pollution that they produce not the government To what extent do you agree or disagree 48
- the law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 48
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...essential duties to take tough measures so as to abate pollution. Apparently, this outlo...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, if, look, so, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1984.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38175034604 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 629.1 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.5794111088 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.714285714 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124884889444 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449075681068 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036943004246 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709500758443 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290747266097 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.