The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport .
The linear representation reveals the amount of commodities shiped in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by road, water, rail and pipeline. Units are caliborated in million tonnes.
It is evident from the line graph that the highest quantity of goods were moved by roads. At initial stage it was 70 and significantly increased througout the period and reached just below 100. After that, material shipped by water transportation shows remarkable growth after 1978 and remained constant till 1998 then increased and stood at 65 in the year 2002.
On the other hand, pipeline had the least amount of material carried. It started with 5 in 1974and inclined in next 28 years then arrived at above 20. However, rail medium started with 40 and went down moderately then stood at above 40.
Overall, it is crystal clear from the graph that all modes of transport shows upward trend.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport . 56
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010. 78
- The diagram below shows information about quartely profit for three companies of united states from 2005 to 2007 78
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisation. Discuss the both views and give your opinion. 73
- The graph below shows the quantiies of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... and pipeline. Units are caliborated in million tonnes. It is evident from the line ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 731.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 148.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93918918919 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48791127476 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55483149901 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689189189189 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 205.2 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8233638046 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2222222222 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234161486264 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076102852834 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834818468917 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137391989355 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873507174323 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.