The graph below shows the quantiies of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The linear chart reveals the amount of materials shipped in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by various modes of transport namely as road, water, rail and pipeline. Units are caliberated in Million tonnes.
To begin with, goods brought started from 70 in year 1974 through road and it swelled significantly after that, it reached just below 100 in 2002. This trend followed by water, it was below 40 and adrastic increase was observed throughout the year, it arrived at above 60. Further in the figure for pipeline, it was about 2 million only and followed same increasing trend as like to other commodities but it was much lower to approximately 20.
Moving toward rail shipped, it was about 40 in initial year and went down moderately and it reached to 41 in 2002. In stark contrast, this figure followed surge pattern but the growth was noticed for only 1 million in all years.
Overall, it is the evident from graph that upward trend was followed by all commodities shipped in given time period.
- The diagram below shows information about quartely profit for three companies of united states from 2005 to 2007 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport . 56
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisation. Discuss the both views and give your opinion. 73
- The graph below shows the quantiies of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 84
- People nowdays work hard to buy more things. This has made our life generally more comfortable but it is a pity many traditional values have been lost on the way such materialism.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a Million'.
Suggestion: A Million
... and pipeline. Units are caliberated in Million tonnes. To begin with, goods brought...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...ghout the year, it arrived at above 60. Further in the figure for pipeline, it was abou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78735632184 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47754481284 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614942528736 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4447509673 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.125 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148646747265 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618501215644 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874198354085 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936414920088 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863158189747 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.