Nowadays, a lot of charities and organizations have set up a number of days name the special day to attract people's attention, like National Children's day, National Non-smoking Day. Why do they have to do so, and what will the effects be?
Although annually, various social problems have emergenced blizzardly, the issue asto whether the purposes of taking these phenomenons to set name for exact days of charities and organizations and performances of these particular days remains unclear.
Firstly, it is clear that almost these unusual days, which is set name by charities and organization, is overheated issues but ignored by modern citizens who become more and more desensitised and indifferent, such as child violence, environment population crisis, smoke population... For this reason, setting special name for one day to draw the attention of audiences is positive action of charities and organizations. Besides, these specific days are able to enlist public sympathy and encourage participant to take more action in social problems. For example, “National Children’s day” could help adults regconite the significance of taking care of children and how to protect them from violence in family, even in school.
Secondly, it is difficulty to estimate about effectiveness of those particular days while the trend of setting special names from the range volunteer organizations has bombarded to community. This trend has impacted on conciousness of citizens and made them less emotion with numorous days which have the same meaning but different name. However, with efforts of charities and organizations which are acummulated through annual activities, could make snow-ball effects to society. Besides, the involvement of celebrities who is representations and ambassators could add influence to each specific days.
Taking all above mentioned facts into account, the particular days which are gave special names by charities and oganizations have created effect on community and society with higher purpose. Howerver, abuse of these specific days by some organizations should be restricted to maintain the goods meaning of this action in public.
- Developments of technology are causing environmental problems. Some people think the solution is that everyone should accept a simpler life, while other believe that technology can solve these problems. Discuss both view and give your opinion 84
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people have benefited from modern communications technology but some people have not benefited from it at all To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
- It is believed that people who read for pleasure have developed a better imagination and better language skills than those who prefer to watch TV Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in family, even in school. Secondly, it is difficulty to estimate about effec...
^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: GAVE_GIVE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'give'?
Suggestion: give
... account, the particular days which are gave special names by charities and oganizat...
^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'given'.
Suggestion: given
... account, the particular days which are gave special names by charities and oganizat...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73867595819 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12960268191 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595818815331 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.6930480832 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.727272727 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312752094756 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119715592568 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627624051994 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201044057215 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149549703319 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.