Universities
The article states that universities should focus on researches. It also provides three reasons to support the claim. However, the speaker explains that teaching methods are more important than conducting researches and refutes each of the author’s reasons.
To begin with, the writer insists that a position of a university in the national ranking system is highly depended on a number of made discoveries and published papers. Therefore, a university should pay attention to conducted studies in order to attract students with high rank. The lecturer, It is said in the lecture contends this point by asserting that the modern rank system takes into account the teaching performance rather than scientific success. According to the speaker, it is more beneficial to concentrate on teaching to reach a high rank.
What is more, the reading reports that researchers make professors and universities more famous and recognizable. These professors are called “Public intellectuals” and they raise the prestige of universities Whereas the listening asserts the main goal of professors is to make knowledge accessible for everyone. According to the lecture, this aim can be more likely achieved by focusing on teaching methods rather than scientific studies.
In addition, the article claims that professors who are conducting plenty of researches are better experts at their fields. It happens because studies allow being informed about every change of views. In contrast, the lecturer opposes this point by explaining that often good scientists are not good teachers. She provides an example of it: a well-known professor from her university is a bright scientist, however, he is not able to deliver a lecture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-21 | BluePegas | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-18 | satwinderkaur | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-14 | sahilshell | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-09 | harmankaur | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | rakeshsoni86 | 44 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, in addition, in contrast, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.48453608247 187% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 4.92783505155 61% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 32.9175257732 64% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 26.3917525773 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 937.175257732 157% => OK
No of words: 267.0 206.0 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49812734082 4.54256449028 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.78020617076 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03658253777 2.54303337028 119% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 127.690721649 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59925093633 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 290.88556701 154% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.13402061856 88% => OK
Article: 8.0 0.824742268041 970% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1722052774 44.8134815571 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.857142857 76.5299724578 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 16.8248392259 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 4.34317383033 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2304315083 0.216113520407 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855162387694 0.0766984524023 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104173516211 0.0603063233224 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141645817865 0.12726935374 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307477122886 0.0580467560999 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 8.37731958763 167% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 70.7449484536 62% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 7.45979381443 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 8.71597938144 168% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 7.59969072165 125% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 41.2886597938 201% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.